Abstract

What is the relationship between the art object and the activity of public discourse? For Hannah Arendt, the constructed world, which includes artworks, is the necessary precondition for substantial and sustained public discourse, which includes politics. However, the artwork itself does not fully participate in that discourse; it does not constitute public speech and action in the properly political sense. Reinterpreting Arendt’s concepts of speech, action, recognition, memory, and the space of appearances, this essay reconsiders the public life of poetry, its existence as both a constructed artifact and a rhetorical act. Synthesizing Arendt’s reflections on the artwork with recent work in contemporary poetics, I illustrate the discursive capacity of poetry through a reading of Wallace Stevens’s “Description without Place.” In Stevens’s poem, public rhetoric and formal construction are inseparable, generating an object that can speak.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.