Abstract

When managerial compensation is restricted to be constant below a certain target output level, and underlying effort is unobserved, a recent article by Liu suggests that the optimal sharing rule should be smooth and locally convex at the target. This is incorrect. If minimum payments are set exogenously, the optimal sharing rule for a risk-averse manager will be kinked at the target. If penalties are unbounded, the principal can approach the first-best full-information outcome by offering a constant payment under normal conditions but imposing a severe punishment for extremely unlikely low outcomes, i.e., by “speaking softly but carrying a big stick.”

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.