Abstract
We present an integrated structural and Anisotropy of Magnetic Susceptibility (AMS) study focused on the characterization of the spatio-temporal variation of the strain field during the main Neogene deformation, of the Argentine Precordillera and the northern Sierras Pampeanas, immediately to the south of the Puna plateau (27°30′S). The AMS from 43 sites and fault-slip data analysis from mesoscale faults (n = 540) were carried out in Lower Miocene to Middle Pliocene sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks. The AMS results show moderate values of anisotropy degree near to deformation zones, and low and high values of bulk susceptibility. The most predominant magnetic fabric is sedimentary type I and II, with a weak magnetic lineation. In areas where the rocks are deformed, the incipient magnetic lineation are subparallel to the regional structural trend and present a main N–S orientation in the Precordillera and Fiambalá basin, while in the Sierras Pampeanas they are mostly NE-oriented. Combining these results with kinematic analysis from fault-slip data, we identify, in the Precordillera and Fiambalá basin areas, a contractional event with E-W main direction, from ~23 Ma to 5 Ma, mostly active from the onset of deposition of Neogene sequences. During this period, in the NW Sierras Pampeanas, the contraction directions follow a NW orientation. The onset of N–S to NNW contraction, mostly recognized in rocks younger than 5 Ma, exposed in the northern areas of Precordillera and Sierra Pampeanas, documents a change of the strain field during the Early-to-Middle Pliocene, associated with a shift in the contractional direction from E-W to N–S. We relate the change to the rapid uplift of the southern Puna, generating a juxtaposition of an area under N–S extension, affecting the topographically-higher Puna, with the other area under N–S contraction in the adjacent Precordillera and Sierras Pampeanas. We associate these two events as part of the evolution of this segment of the Andes, where the broken foreland setting is active during this time. By combining the AMS and kinematic analysis results, we obtain a timing for the spatio-temporal change of contraction directions, which allows us to compare both the broken-foreland and foreland basins to understand spatio-temporal strain variations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.