Abstract

Real‐world objects approaching or passing by an observer often generate visual, auditory, and tactile signals with different onsets and durations. Prompt detection and avoidance of an impending threat depend on precise binding of looming signals across modalities. Here we constructed a multisensory apparatus to study the spatiotemporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli near the face. In a psychophysical experiment, subjects assessed the subjective synchrony between a looming ball and an air puff delivered to the same side of the face with a varying temporal offset. Multisensory stimuli with similar onset times were perceived as completely out of sync and assessed with the lowest subjective synchrony index (SSI). Across subjects, the SSI peaked at an offset between 800 and 1,000 ms, where the multisensory stimuli were perceived as optimally in sync. In an fMRI experiment, tactile, visual, tactile‐visual out‐of‐sync (TVoS), and tactile‐visual in‐sync (TViS) stimuli were delivered to either side of the face in randomized events. Group‐average statistical responses to different stimuli were compared within each surface‐based region of interest (sROI) outlined on the cortical surface. Most sROIs showed a preference for contralateral stimuli and higher responses to multisensory than unisensory stimuli. In several bilateral sROIs, particularly the human MT+ complex and V6A, responses to spatially aligned multisensory stimuli (TVoS) were further enhanced when the stimuli were in‐sync (TViS), as expressed by TVoS < TViS. This study demonstrates the perceptual and neural mechanisms of multisensory integration near the face, which has potential applications in the development of multisensory entertainment systems and media.

Highlights

  • Eighteen pairs of matching bilateral surface-based region of interest (sROI) were outlined on inflated cortical surfaces

  • Multisensory stimuli presented with similar onset times were subjectively perceived and interpreted as completely out of sync and assessed with the lowest subjective synchrony index (SSI)

  • As the temporal offset increased, SSI increased steadily and peaked between 800 and 1,000 ms, where multisensory stimuli were perceived as optimally in sync and assessed with a high certainty. These results suggest that the optimal temporal integration of looming visual and tactile stimuli took place at the moment of expected impact rather than at stimulus onsets

Read more

Summary

Objectives

While previous studies have demonstrated that spatially aligned multisensory stimuli elicit stronger activations in contralateral brain regions, this study aims to determine whether temporally synchronized multisensory stimuli further enhances the activation

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.