Abstract

Many studies have analyzed the impact of climate change on crop productivity, but comparing the performance of water management systems has rarely been explored. Because water supply and crop demand in agro-systems may be affected by global climate change in shaping the spatial patterns of agricultural production, we should evaluate how and where irrigation practices are effective in mitigating climate change effects. Here we have constructed simple, general models, based on biological mechanisms and a theoretical framework, which could be useful in explaining and predicting crop productivity dynamics. We have studied maize in irrigated and rain-fed systems at a provincial scale, from 1996 to 2009 in Spain, one of the most prominent “hot-spots” in future climate change projections. Our new approach allowed us to: (1) evaluate new structural properties such as the stability of crop yield dynamics, (2) detect nonlinear responses to climate change (thresholds and discontinuities), challenging the usual linear way of thinking, and (3) examine spatial patterns of yield losses due to water constraints and identify clusters of provinces that have been negatively affected by warming. We have reduced the uncertainty associated with climate change impacts on maize productivity by improving the understanding of the relative contributions of individual factors and providing a better spatial comprehension of the key processes. We have identified water stress and water management systems as being key causes of the yield gap, and detected vulnerable regions where efforts in research and policy should be prioritized in order to increase maize productivity.

Highlights

  • Spatio-temporal patterns of agricultural production are clearly influenced both by climate change and agricultural management practices

  • Regulatory structure: endogenous feedback We found that maize productivity had a persistently negative effect on crop yields for a one year time delay (first order negative feedback, PRCF(1))

  • We identified the same regulation structure for both management systems, i.e. a negative first-order feedback process that tends to stabilize the crop’s dynamics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatio-temporal patterns of agricultural production are clearly influenced both by climate change and agricultural management practices. We need to evaluate how and where irrigation practices (e.g. rain-fed versus irrigated) are effective in mitigating the effects of climate change, because water constraints and crop demand in agro-systems could be increased due to climate change [3,4,5,6,7]. Identifying whether there are any differences in the principal bio-physical factors and mechanisms that explain both systems will enable us to improve crop productivity without expanding the cropland area and to diminish the adverse impacts of agriculture for social and ecological systems [8]. We do not know much about crop response to climate change yet, and still less about the differential response between irrigated and rain-fed systems [4]. Increases in agriculture production could potentially come from increases in irrigated crops, because higher yields could be attained with reduced production variability [9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call