Abstract

Abstract. The assessment of vulnerability has moved to centre-stage of the debate between different scientific disciplines related to climate change and disaster risk management. Composed by a combination of social, economical, physical and environmental factors the assessment implies combining different domains as well as quantitative with qualitative data and makes it therefore a challenge to identify an integrated metric for vulnerability. In this paper we define vulnerability in the context of climate change, targeting the hazard "flood". The developed methodology is being tested in the Salzach river catchment in Austria, which is largely prone to floods. The proposed methodology allows the spatial quantification of vulnerability and the identification of vulnerability units. These units build upon the geon concept which acts as a framework for the regionalization of continuous spatial information according to defined parameters of homogeneity. Using geons, we are capable of transforming singular domains of information on specific systemic components to policy-relevant, conditioned information. Considering the fact that vulnerability is not directly measurable and due to its complex dimension and social construction an expert-based approach has been chosen. Established methodologies such as Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Delphi exercises and regionalization approaches are being integrated. The method not only enables the assessment of vulnerability independent from administrative boundaries, but also applies an aggregation mode which reflects homogenous vulnerability units. This supports decision makers to reflect on complex issues such as vulnerability. Next to that, the advantage is to decompose the units to their underlying domains. Feedback from disaster management experts indicates that the approach helps to improve the design of measures aimed at strengthening preparedness and mitigation. From this point of view, we reach a step closer towards validation of the proposed method, comprising critical user-oriented aspects like adequateness, practicability and usability of the provided results in general.

Highlights

  • The assessment of vulnerability has moved to centre-stage of the debate between different scientific disciplines related to climate change and disaster risk management

  • These units build upon the geon concept which acts as a framework for the regionalization of continuous spatial information according to defined parameters of homogeneity

  • The concept of modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) and the related effect of “ecological fallacy” (Openshaw, 1984) have been often discussed within the context of spatial representation and modeling: the first term explains the fact that any spatial information depends on the underlying logic of Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union

Read more

Summary

Motivation and background

In order to monitor and to capture vulnerability from a decision maker’s point of view, appropriate means of quantification and visualization have to be available. The concept of modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) and the related effect of “ecological fallacy” (Openshaw, 1984) have been often discussed within the context of spatial representation and modeling: the first term explains the fact that any spatial information depends on the underlying logic of Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. In order to minimize the unit-related biases, we will present a method for identifying and automatically delineating concept-related fiat boundaries (Smith and Mark, 1998) for vulnerability units. This paper discusses a spatial explicit model for assessing socio-economic vulnerability to flood hazards at the sub-national level and independent from administrative boundaries. The spatial modeling of vulnerability units (VulnUs, Kienberger et al, 2008) follows a conceptualization developed within this research context and has been tested by analyzing the flood hazard in the Salzach river catchment (Austria)

Case study
Defining vulnerability in the context of water and climate change issues
Place-based modelling of vulnerability
The geon concept
Workflow and expert knowledge
Integration of indicators
Results and discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.