Abstract
Event Abstract Back to Event Spatial vision in insects: How visual information processing is facilitated by an active flight and gaze strategy Martin Egelhaaf1*, Roland Kern1 and Jens P. Lindemann1 1 Bielefeld University, Neurobiology & CITEC, Germany Flying insects, such as blowflies and bees rely on the image flow on their eyes (“optic flow”) solving spatial tasks as diverse as collision avoidance and local navigation, i.e. localizing a previously learnt inconspicuous goal on the basis of landmark cues. In free flight flies and bees exhibit characteristic behavioural actions to shape the dynamics of the optic flow. By employing a saccadic flight and gaze strategy they squeeze rotations into brief and rapid turns leaving most of the flight time for various types of translational prototypical movements. Separation of rotational and translational optic flow components by a behavioural strategy is reasonable , since only the optic flow component induced by translations contains information about the relative distance of environmental structures from the animal. By combined electrophysiological analysis and model simulations we analyzed how during rotational and translational self-motion information about the spatial layout and the textural properties of both experimenter-designed and natural environments are represented at the different processing stages of the visual motion pathway. Only two major conclusions shall be mentioned here: (1) during intersaccadic translational flight, the mechanisms of local motion detection segregate in a computationally cheap way natural sceneries into their depth structure: nearby objects pop out in the activity profile of retinotopic arrays of local motion detectors, whereas more distant structures evoke only negligible responses. (2) Even after spatial pooling of local motion signals by the dendritic trees of the wide-field cells in the lobula complex of flies and bees, these distance dependent response modulations persist. Hence, these neurons, which are traditionally conceived as rotation sensors being involved in mediating compensatory optomotor responses, provide information about the spatial properties of the environment. In conclusion, the neural processing of spatial information in flies and bees is greatly facilitated by their saccadic flight and gaze strategy. This active vision strategy enables the nervous system to solve apparently complex spatial vision tasks in a computationally parsimonious way. Thus, by making use of the closed action–perception loop in a smart way, insects with their tiny brains are capable of performing extraordinarily well even on extremely fast timescales of some ten milliseconds. Acknowledgements The work in our lab is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Keywords: motion vision, Spatial Vision, Optic Flow, collision avoidance, navigation, fly, Honeybee, Bumblebee, Flight control Conference: International Conference on Invertebrate Vision, Fjälkinge, Sweden, 1 Aug - 8 Aug, 2013. Presentation Type: Oral presentation preferred Topic: Motion vision Citation: Egelhaaf M, Kern R and Lindemann JP (2019). Spatial vision in insects: How visual information processing is facilitated by an active flight and gaze strategy. Front. Physiol. Conference Abstract: International Conference on Invertebrate Vision. doi: 10.3389/conf.fphys.2013.25.00044 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 25 Feb 2013; Published Online: 09 Dec 2019. * Correspondence: Prof. Martin Egelhaaf, Bielefeld University, Neurobiology & CITEC, Bielefeld, D-33501, Germany, martin.egelhaaf@uni-bielefeld.de Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Martin Egelhaaf Roland Kern Jens P Lindemann Google Martin Egelhaaf Roland Kern Jens P Lindemann Google Scholar Martin Egelhaaf Roland Kern Jens P Lindemann PubMed Martin Egelhaaf Roland Kern Jens P Lindemann Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.