Abstract

Spatial variation of soil carbon dioxide (CO2) flux during a growing season within corn and soybean canopies has not been quantified. These cropping systems are the most intense in the United States and the potential for carbon (C) sequestration in these systems through changes in soil management practices create an opportunity for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions; however, the need to understand the variation in fields is critical to evaluating changes in management systems. A study was designed to evaluate the spatial variation in soil CO2 fluxes along two transects in corn and soybean fields. Samples were collected every 5 m along a 100 m transect between the rows of the crop and also along a transect in which the plants had been removed to reduce the potential of root respiration. Soil CO2 fluxes were collected at each position with air temperature, soil temperature at 0.05 m, and soil water content (0 - 0.06 m). At the end of the season, soil samples for the upper 0.1 m were collected for soil organic C content, pH, sand, silt, and clay contents. On each day measurements were made, the observed CO2 emissions were scaled by dividing the CO2 flux at each position by the mean CO2 flux of the entire transect. Observed CO2 fluxes were signifycantly larger in the row than in the fallow position for both crops. There were no differences between the corn and soybean fallow transects; however, the corn row samples were larger than the soybean row samples. No consistent spatial patterns were observed in the CO2 fluxes or any of the soil properties over the course of the study. When the CO2 flux data were combined over the season, there was a significant spatial pattern in the fallow transects for both crops but not for the row transects. Sampling for CO2 flux values in cropping systems has to consider the presence of a crop canopy and the amount of root respiration.

Highlights

  • Interest in climate change mitigation strategies has prompted a renewed study in the amount of carbon (C) sequestered in the soil

  • The primary effect of tillage systems was due to the impact of the tillage system on the production of biomass which could be converted into soil organic C rather than the act of tilling the soil

  • Since soil water content had been shown in previous studies to be the primary factor affecting soil CO2 fluxes we focused on soil water content in relation to CO2 flux

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interest in climate change mitigation strategies has prompted a renewed study in the amount of carbon (C) sequestered in the soil. Quantification of the carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes at the soil surface has been studied in many different ways ranging from soil chambers [2], soil sampling [3], to micrometeorological methods [4]. All of these offer different methods of providing a quantification of the CO2 fluxes; a question remains about the density of the measurements required to obtain a reliable estimate of the fluxes across a landscape and among different agricultural practices. The primary effect of tillage systems was due to the impact of the tillage system on the production of biomass which could be converted into soil organic C rather than the act of tilling the soil In their study, they observed an interaction between tillage and soil water

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call