Abstract
Microscopic tephra layers (‘cryptotephras’) represent important age-equivalent stratigraphic markers utilised in many palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. When used in conjunction with proximal records of volcanic activity they can also provide information about volcanic ash cloud fallout and frequency. However, the spatial distributions of tephra layers can be discontinuous even within the same region. Understanding the deposition and post-depositional redistribution of tephra is vital if we are to use cryptotephras as records of ash cloud occurrence and chronostratigraphic markers. The discrete nature of tephra layers also allows for detailed study into processes of deposition and reworking which affect many palaeoenvironmental proxy records.We undertook a multi-core study in order to examine the historical tephrostratigraphy of a raised peatland in Northern Ireland. Three tephra layers originating from Iceland (Hekla 1947, Hekla 1845 and Hekla 1510) are present in 14 of the 15 cores analysed. This suggests that in areas not influenced by snowfall or anthropogenic disturbance at the time of tephra delivery, the presence or absence of a tephra layer is generally consistent across a peatland of this type. However, tephra shard counts (per unit area) vary by an order of magnitude between cores. These intra-site differences may confound the interpretation of shard counts from single cores as records of regional ash cloud mass/density. Bootstrap resampling analysis suggests that total shard counts from multiple cores are required in order to make a reliable estimate of median shard counts for a site. The presence of three historical tephras in 14 cores enables a spatio-temporal analysis of the long-term apparent rate of carbon accumulation (LARCA) in the peatland. Substantial spatial and temporal variations in LARCA are identified over the last ∼450 years. This high variability needs to be taken into account when designing studies of peatland carbon accumulation.
Highlights
Tephra layers preserved in European peatlands provide both a valuable geochronological tool (e.g. Davies, 2015; Dugmore et al, 1995; Lane et al, 2013) and a record of past volcanic activity and ash dispersal events (Swindles et al, 2011b)
Tephra layers in peatlands can occasionally span a depth of a few centimetres, the peak is most often confined to a narrow horizon in thickness (Swindles and Plunkett, 2011)
These factors suggest that peatlands should act as an excellent archive of past volcanic ash fallout, and that peat records can be used to map the spatial distribution of past fallout events on a continental scale (Swindles et al, 2011; Lawson et al, 2012)
Summary
Tephra layers preserved in European peatlands provide both a valuable geochronological tool (e.g. Davies, 2015; Dugmore et al, 1995; Lane et al, 2013) and a record of past volcanic activity and ash dispersal events (Swindles et al, 2011b). Davies, 2015; Dugmore et al, 1995; Lane et al, 2013) and a record of past volcanic activity and ash dispersal events (Swindles et al, 2011b). Tephra layers in peatlands can occasionally span a depth of a few centimetres, the peak is most often confined to a narrow horizon in thickness (Swindles and Plunkett, 2011). These factors suggest that peatlands should act as an excellent archive of past volcanic ash fallout, and that peat records can be used to map the spatial distribution of past fallout events on a continental scale (Swindles et al, 2011; Lawson et al, 2012).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
