Abstract

A method is presented for measuring the location of individuals with respect to the center or perimeter of a primate group. The method estimates an individual’s domain of danger: the area in which a hidden predator is closer to the individual than to other group members (cf. Hamilton, 1971). A domain is determined by the directions and distances of particular neighbors from a given individual. Animals at peripheral locations have relatively large domains, whereas animals at central locations have relatively small domains. Domains of danger were sampled for members of two groups of chacma baboons (Papio ursinus)in northern Botswana, to test for nonrandom spatial patterns throughout the day. Females with infants had significantly smaller domains than did females without infants. Domains also were correlated with social ranks of females;high-ranking females had smaller domains than did low-ranking females, possibly because high-ranking females were more likely to have infant offspring. For adult males, however,domain sizes were not significantly correlated with social ranks. Immigration status of adult males, rather than social rank, better accounted for spatial positioning.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call