Spatial structure in ecological communities – a quantitative analysis

Abstract

The spatial structure of communities has recently gained much attention in ecology. Spatial structure comprises an important element in communities, but the literature lacks a thorough investigation about possible among‐organism or among‐ecosystem differences in the degree of spatial structure. Here, I conducted a quantitative review to determine if the degree of spatial structure varied predictably between the major organism types and ecosystems. Spatial structure was quantified as the relative fraction of community variation explained purely by spatial variables (fraction S/E). I integrated data from 322 variation partition analyses both in a generalized linear model (GLM) and using a boosted regression tree method, and showed that a mean of 11.0% of the variation in community composition was explained purely by spatial variables. Across all taxa, a body size–S/E relationship was positive. In GLM, fraction S/E increased highly significantly with study extent, it was highest among terrestrial taxa and higher in ectotherms than in homoiotherms. Spatial structure was also higher in omnivores than in autotrophs. These results suggest that the degree of spatial structure is jointly driven by extrinsic factors such as study extent and ecosystem type, and intrinsic factors such as body size, thermoregulation and interactions between body size and dispersal mode. These results should be important not only for basic research, but also conservation and bioassessment programs would benefit from the information about the magnitude of spatial variation in nature.SynthesisSpatial processes comprise an important element in most ecological communities, but the degree to which spatial structure varies across organisms or ecosystems is poorly known. Here, a quantitative review of 322 variation partition analyses indicated that spatial component varied predictably across ecological communities – it was driven by study extent and ecosystem type as well as by species traits such as body size and thermoregulation. These results give deep insights into the magnitude of spatial variation in nature and should be highly beneficial for conservation and bioassessment programs that are built on the information about how communities vary in space.