Spatial repellency and attractancy responses of some chemical lures against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Anopheles minimus (Diptera: Culicidae) using the high-throughput screening system.

Abstract

We evaluated the behavioral responses of Aedes albopictus and Anopheles minimus to 3 isovaleric acid and lactic acid-based chemical lure blends and 2 individual alcohols, using Spatial Repellency Assay in a high-throughput screening system (HITSS). Five doses of 0.0002, 0.001, 0.0025, 0.005, and 0.01 g were tested per lure. A BG-lure was used as a reference standard. After 10-min exposure, the number of mosquitoes moving toward or away from the treated chamber was calculated. The results showed that all lures were repellent against Ae. albopictus except for Lure-4 (4% w/v isovaleric acid + 2% w/v lactic acid + 0.0025% w/v myristic acid + 2.5% w/v ammonium hydroxide) which showed a nonsignificant attractancy at the lowest dose. Significantly high spatial repellency was observed at the highest dose of all the tested lures including BG-lure. Lure-2 (isoamyl alcohol) was significantly repellent at all the tested doses. Against An. minimus, Lure-5 (0.02% w/v isovaleric acid + 2% w/v lactic acid) showed significant spatial repellency while Lure-4 was significantly attractant, at all the tested doses. All lures, except Lure-4, showed strong spatial repellency at high doses and attractancy or weak spatial repellency at the lowest dose of 0.0002 g. In summary, our study demonstrated that spatial repellency and attractancy of the tested lures were influenced by both the dose tested and the mosquito species. Lure-2 and Lure-4 are potential spatial repellents and attractants, respectively, for malaria and dengue vectors. However, further studies are necessary to confirm these results at a semifield and open field level.