Abstract

BackgroundChild low and high birth weight are important public health problems. Many studies have looked at factors of low and high birth weight using mean regression. This study aimed at using quantile regression to find out determinants of low and high birth weight.MethodsSpatial quantile regression models at 0.05 and 0.95 percentiles of birth weight were fitted to 13,087 children birth weight in kilograms using Malawi demographic health survey data of 2010 study. Full Bayesian method by integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) was used to estimate the model. Second order random walk priors were assigned for mother age and antenatal visits for pregnancy while Gaussian markov random field prior was used for district of the child.ResultsResidual spatial patterns reveal areas in the southern region promoting high birth weight while areas in the central and northern region promote low birth weight. Most fixed effects findings are consistent with the literature. Richest family, normal mother body mass index (BMI), mother over weight (BMI > 25 kg/m2), birth order 2–3, mother secondary education and height (≥150 cm) negate low birth weight while weight 45–70 kg promote low birth weight. Birth order category 6+, mother height (≥150 cm) and poor wealth quintile, promote high birth weight, while richer and richest wealth quintiles and education categories: primary, secondary, and higher, and mother overweight (BMI > 25 kg/m2) reduce high birth weight. Antenatal visits for pregnancy reduce both low and high birth weight.ConclusionStrategies to reduce low and high birth weight should simultaneously address mother education, weight gain during pregnancy and poverty while targeting areas increasing low and high birth weight.

Highlights

  • Child low and high birth weight are important public health problems

  • body mass index (BMI) separately was being used as proxy measure of mother nutrition status where low BMI means under nutrition and high BMI means overweight, and height in particular was being used as a proxy measure of hereditary factor in influencing Low birth weight (LBW) and High birth weight (HBW) where normally tall mothers tend to give birth to high birth weight babies and vice versa

  • Similar to [22], in terms of birth order number, the prevalence of low birth weight babies is higher for first born babies than babies born later while prevalence of high birth weight is higher for higher order number babies (X2 = 28.41, p < 0.001)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Child low and high birth weight are important public health problems. Many studies have looked at factors of low and high birth weight using mean regression. This study aimed at using quantile regression to find out determinants of low and high birth weight. High birth weight (HBW) defined as new born weight greater than 4.5 kg is an emerging public health issue in developing countries [1]. HBW is under reported in sub-Saharan Africa. Fetal problems like still birth, Erb’s palsy, infant jaundice, and respiratory distress have been identified to be rampant in high birth weight new born babies than normal weight babies [6]. Low birth weight (LBW) according to [11] is defined as weight less than 2.5 kg. LBW is a public health issue as it brings about prenatal and neonatal deaths. World distribution of LBW shows that subSaharan Africa has the second highest prevalence of LBW, pegged at 15% and Malawi part of sub Saharan Africa has 12% prevalence [12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call