Abstract

This study compared the performance of ordinary kriging (OK) and regression kriging (RK) to predict soil physical-chemical properties in topsoil (0-15 cm). Mean prediction of error and root mean square of prediction error were used to assess the prediction methods. Two watersheds with contrasting soil-landscape features were studied, for which the prediction methods were performed differently. A multiple linear stepwise regression model was performed with RK using digital terrain models (DTMs) and remote sensing images in order to choose the best auxiliary covariates. Different pedogenic factors and land uses control soil property distributions in each watershed, and soil properties often display contrasting scales of variability. Environmental covariables and predictive methods can be useful in one site study, but inappropriate in another one. A better linear correlation was found at Lavrinha Creek Watershed, suggesting a relationship between contemporaneous landforms and soil properties, and RK outperformed OK. In most cases, RK did not outperform OK at the Marcela Creek Watershed due to lack of linear correlation between covariates and soil properties. Since alternatives of simple OK have been sought, other prediction methods should also be tested, considering not only the linear relationships between covariate and soil properties, but also the systematic pattern of soil property distributions over that landscape.

Highlights

  • Geostatistic techniques can estimate soil properties at unsampled locations, providing valuable information for precision agriculture and environmental studies

  • This study compared the performance of ordinary kriging (OK) and regression kriging (RK) to predict soil physical-chemical properties in topsoil (0-15 cm)

  • A multiple linear stepwise regression model was performed with RK using digital terrain models (DTMs) and remote sensing images in order to choose the best auxiliary covariates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Geostatistic techniques can estimate soil properties at unsampled locations, providing valuable information for precision agriculture and environmental studies. Ordinary kriging (OK) is a spatial interpolation technique that depends on a weighting scheme dictated by the variogram, where closer sample locations have greater impact on the final prediction (Bishop and McBratney, 2001). As OK uses only observed data to map unsampled areas, more recent innovations have been preferred, such as hybrid geostatistical procedures. These techniques account for environmental correlation, and often result in more accurate local predictions (Goovaerts, 1999; McBratney et al, 2000). One example is the regression kriging (RK), in which the interpolation is based on observed data, and on the spatial structure of residuals from regression of the target variable on spatially exhaustive auxiliary variables (raster based mainly) (Hengl et al, 2007)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.