Abstract

Predicting disability in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) is extremely challenging. Although there is some evidence that the spatial distribution of white matter (WM) lesions may play a role in disability accumulation, the lack of well-established quantitative metrics that characterise these aspects of MS pathology makes it difficult to assess their relevance for clinical progression. This study introduces a novel approach, called SPACE-MS, to quantitatively characterise spatial distributional features of brain MS lesions, so that these can be assessed as predictors of disability accumulation. In SPACE-MS, the covariance matrix of the spatial positions of each patient’s lesional voxels is computed and its eigenvalues extracted. These are combined to derive rotationally-invariant metrics known to be common and robust descriptors of ellipsoid shape such as anisotropy, planarity and sphericity. Additionally, SPACE-MS metrics include a neuraxis caudality index, which we defined for the whole-brain lesion mask as well as for the most caudal brain lesion. These indicate how distant from the supplementary motor cortex (along the neuraxis) the whole-brain mask or the most caudal brain lesions are.We applied SPACE-MS to data from 515 patients involved in three studies: the MS-SMART (NCT01910259) and MS-STAT1 (NCT00647348) secondary progressive MS trials, and an observational study of primary and secondary progressive MS. Patients were assessed on motor and cognitive disability scales and underwent structural brain MRI (1.5/3.0 T), at baseline and after 2 years. The MRI protocol included 3DT1-weighted (1x1x1mm3) and 2DT2-weighted (1x1x3mm3) anatomical imaging. WM lesions were semiautomatically segmented on the T2-weighted scans, deriving whole-brain lesion masks. After co-registering the masks to the T1 images, SPACE-MS metrics were calculated and analysed through a series of multiple linear regression models, which were built to assess the ability of spatial distributional metrics to explain concurrent and future disability after adjusting for confounders.Patients whose WM lesions laid more caudally along the neuraxis or were more isotropically distributed in the brain (i.e. with whole-brain lesion masks displaying a high sphericity index) at baseline had greater motor and/or cognitive disability at baseline and over time, independently of brain lesion load and atrophy measures. In conclusion, here we introduced the SPACE-MS approach, which we showed is able to capture clinically relevant spatial distributional features of MS lesions independently of the sheer amount of lesions and brain tissue loss. Location of lesions in lower parts of the brain, where neurite density is particularly high, such as in the cerebellum and brainstem, and greater spatial spreading of lesions (i.e. more isotropic whole-brain lesion masks), possibly reflecting a higher number of WM tracts involved, are associated with clinical deterioration in progressive MS. The usefulness of the SPACE-MS approach, here demonstrated in MS, may be explored in other conditions also characterised by the presence of brain WM lesions.

Highlights

  • In most neurological conditions characterised by the presence of white matter (WM) lesions in the central nervous system (CNS), such as multiple sclerosis (MS), CNS vasculitis, or small vessel disease (SVD), the extent of such lesions is strongly associated with the severity of the disease (Cannerfelt et al, 2018; Pantoni, 2010; Thompson et al, 2018; Tintore et al, 2015)

  • Here we propose a method devel­ oped to assess the spatial distribution of WM brain lesions and apply it to MS

  • With this study we introduced novel fully-automated metrics char­ acterising clinically-relevant aspects of the spatial distribution of brain lesions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In most neurological conditions characterised by the presence of white matter (WM) lesions in the central nervous system (CNS), such as multiple sclerosis (MS), CNS vasculitis, or small vessel disease (SVD), the extent of such lesions is strongly associated with the severity of the disease (Cannerfelt et al, 2018; Pantoni, 2010; Thompson et al, 2018; Tintore et al, 2015). Research studies have proposed metrics like lesion counts or volume, their correlation with clinical out­ comes is weaker than desired (Fisniku et al, 2008). This happens because, at least partly, they do not account for other, potentially crucial aspects of lesions such as their spatial location or the degree of tissue destruction caused by them (Grussu et al, 2017; Naismith et al, 2010; Absinta et al, 2019). A formal, quantitative characterisation of the spatial distribution of brain WM lesions has never been carried out, hampering the assessment of its relevance for clinical progression in neurological conditions. Here we propose a method devel­ oped to assess the spatial distribution of WM brain lesions and apply it to MS

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call