Abstract

AbstractCrop insurance is similar to flood and hurricane insurance in that spatially correlated weather tends to cause violations of the independence assumption. Ideally, one would seek to pool uncorrelated risk drawn from the same distribution in crop insurance. This article proposes a testing procedure for the cross‐sectional pooling of group units, and empirically analyzes whether the proposed test improves out‐of‐sample rating performance. We utilize a balanced panel of U.S. county‐level corn yields for 510 counties, and the results of an out‐of‐sample crop insurance rating performance exercise provide economic significance to the proposed pooling methodology and results.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call