Abstract

AbstractFor many hydrological applications interpolation of point rainfall measurements is needed. One such application is flood early warning, particularly where spatially distributed hydrological models are used. Operation in real time poses challenges to the interpolation procedure, as this should then both be automatic and efficiently provide robust interpolation of gauged data. The differences in performance of ordinary kriging, universal kriging, and kriging with external drift with individual and pooled variograms were assessed for 139 daily datasets with significant precipitation in a study area in Bogotá, Colombia. Interpolators were compared using the percentage of variability explained and the root-mean-square error found in cross validation, aiming at identifying a procedure for real-time interpolation. The results showed that interpolators using pooled variograms provide a performance comparable to when the interpolators were applied to the storms individually, showing that they can be used successfully for interpolation in real-time operation in the study area. The analysis identified limitations in the use of kriging with external drift. Only when the adjusted R2 between the secondary variables and precipitation is higher than the percentage of variability explained found in ordinary kriging, then kriging with external drift provided a consistent improvement. This interpolator was found to give a lower performance in all other cases. The distribution of precipitation over basins of interest for each of the storms, derived through sampling rainfall fields generated through conditional Gaussian simulation, shows that, while differences between the interpolators may appear to be significant, the variability of the precipitation volume is less significant.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call