Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that the G-protein-coupled secretin receptor is present as a homodimer, organized through symmetrical contacts in transmembrane domain IV, and that receptor dimerization is critical for high-potency signalling by secretin. However, whether all of the receptor exists in the dimeric form or if this is regulated is unclear. We used measures of quantal brightness of the secretin receptor tagged with monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (mEGFP) and spatial intensity distribution analysis to assess this. Calibration using cells expressing plasma membrane-anchored forms of mEGFP initially allowed us to demonstrate that the epidermal growth factor receptor is predominantly monomeric in the absence of ligand and while wild-type receptor was rapidly converted into a dimeric form by ligand, a mutated form of this receptor remained monomeric. Equivalent studies showed that, at moderate expression levels, the secretin receptor exists as a mixture of monomeric and dimeric forms, with little evidence of higher-order complexity. However, sodium butyrate-induced up-regulation of the receptor resulted in a shift from monomeric towards oligomeric organization. In contrast, a form of the secretin receptor containing a pair of mutations on the lipid-facing side of transmembrane domain IV was almost entirely monomeric. Down-regulation of the secretin receptor-interacting G-protein Gαs did not alter receptor organization, indicating that dimerization is defined specifically by direct protein–protein interactions between copies of the receptor polypeptide, while short-term treatment with secretin had no effect on organization of the wild-type receptor but increased the dimeric proportion of the mutated receptor variant.

Highlights

  • The concept that single-polypeptide G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form, exist and may function as dimers and/or higher-order oligomers, rather than as monomers, has steadily gained acceptance [1,2]

  • Spatial intensity distribution analysis (SpIDA) has been suggested to be able to do so [18,19], and in recent times we have shown that SpIDA can identify both monomeric versus dimeric/oligomeric organization, and ligand regulation of such organizational structure, by appropriate mathematical analysis of regions of interest (RoIs) within laser scanning confocal images from cells expressing a single protein construct tagged with a suitable fluorophore [20,21,22]

  • SpIDA can sample confocal laser scanning images to discriminate between distributions of monomers and dimers/oligomers of proteins tagged with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) within defined RoIs [18,19,20,21,22]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept that single-polypeptide G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form, exist and may function as dimers and/or higher-order oligomers, rather than as monomers, has steadily gained acceptance [1,2]. Spatial intensity distribution analysis (SpIDA) has been suggested to be able to do so [18,19], and in recent times we have shown that SpIDA can identify both monomeric versus dimeric/oligomeric organization, and ligand regulation of such organizational structure, by appropriate mathematical analysis of regions of interest (RoIs) within laser scanning confocal images from cells expressing a single protein construct tagged with a suitable fluorophore [20,21,22]. We have applied SpIDA to reassess the basal organizational structure of the secretin receptor at different expression levels and the effects of mutations within transmembrane domain IV on this, as well as to probe the contribution of G-protein to the stability of secretin receptor organization and the potential of the ligand secretin to alter this. Extensive down-regulation of Gαs, the key signal transducing G-protein associated with secretin receptor function, had no effect on the distribution of receptor quaternary structure while, without effect on the structure of the wild-type receptor, short-term addition of secretin increases the organizational structure of the mutationally modified form of the receptor that compromises basal dimerization

Experimental procedures
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.