Abstract

Data from the two different methane/air jet experimental databases is examined to understand the effects of spatial variations in the conditional averages of reactive scalars in the context of the Conditional Source-term Estimation (CSE) model, with particular emphasis on the double-conditional version, DCSE. Data from all spatial locations and from the four turbulent flames in the Sandia/TUD database are averaged together to generate a global, two-condition (mixture fraction and a species-based reaction progress variable) conditional average; it is found that the conditional fluctuations around this new, two-condition conditional average do not exhibit any significant dependence on either spatial location or even on Reynolds number. Furthermore, the normalized RMS of the conditional fluctuations are found to be dramatically lower than those seen using only one condition. These results indicate that the two-condition conditional averages in the Sandia/TUD piloted methane/air flame series do not vary in space, nor vary with Reynolds number. In the Sydney Swirl burner data, the two-condition conditional averages exhibit modest gradients in space which are attributed to heat transfer with the bluff body in the flow; when a third condition is added – based on the total enthalpy – the spatial gradients in the conditional average of temperature a dramatically reduced. In both of the cases tested, the normalized RMS of the conditional fluctuations around both the two- and three-condition conditional averages are relatively small. These results imply that, in a simulation of these flames using DCSE, one would be better off ignoring spatial variations in the conditional averages and instead collecting all of the spatial data together for the integral equation inversion using either two or three conditioning variables in a single, global ensemble species involved in relatively slow chemistry, such as NO. The results also imply that the underlying assumptions in DCSE – that the conditional variances and the spatial gradients in the conditional averages are both negligible – are valid when sufficient conditioning variables are used, at least for the flames considered.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.