Abstract

With the rapid economic development and the acceleration of urbanization, the pressure on the water resources system is becoming intense. As an important indicator of water resources security and sustainable development, the water resources carrying capacity has become a hot issue. To overcome the limitation of commonly used methods for weight determination and to evaluate the regional water resources carrying capacity reasonably, the index weight determined by the Analytic Hierarchy Process method was revised by the subtraction set pair potential to calculate the dynamic index weight. Then, the dynamic weight was combined with the set pair analysis method to evaluate the regional water resources carrying capacity dynamically. In addition, the Dagum Gini coefficient and its decomposition method were used to analyze the overall difference of water resources carrying capacity in the whole region and the differences within and between subregions considering the lack of quantitative research in spatial equilibrium. Finally, a case study was carried out in Anhui Province, China. The results showed that from 2011 to 2018, most of the water resources carrying capacity for 16 cities in Anhui Province were in a critical state, with the strongest in the south of Anhui Province and the weakest in the north. The overall spatial difference of carrying capacity in Anhui Province showed an increasing trend from 2011 to 2018. Furthermore, the slightest difference within the subregion was in the north of Anhui Province, while the largest was in the south. The most significant difference between the subregions was between the south and the north of Anhui Province. The primary source of carrying capacity spatial difference in Anhui Province was from the difference between subregions. The results of the case study suggested that the method proposed in this paper are conducive to the early find of possible disadvantages of spatial equilibrium and can effectively identify the main source of regional spatial difference in water resources carrying capacity, which means that the method can be widely applied to similar issues.

Highlights

  • As essential natural resources and strategic economic resources, water resources play an important role in maintaining human survival and sustainable development of economic and social

  • In order to study the impact of dynamic weight on the evaluation results, the evaluation results of water resources carrying capacity determined by dynamic weight were compared with the evaluation results determined by the initial weight

  • The water resources carrying capacity status evaluated by the dynamic weights are worse, which is conducive to the early identification of adverse situations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As essential natural resources and strategic economic resources, water resources play an important role in maintaining human survival and sustainable development of economic and social. Peng et al, (2021) used cloud model for index weight and comprehensive evaluation calculation to evaluate the water resources carrying capacity in the karst area; Wang et al, (2021) combined the improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and the system dynamics model to evaluate the water resources carrying capacity of Changchun; Wu et al, (2020) established a water resources carrying capacity evaluation model based on the multi-dimensional cloud model and risk matrix coupling; Cui et al (2018) used the improved entropy method to determine the index weight and established the water resources carrying capacity evaluation model by Set Pair Analysis (SPA) method All these evaluation problems involve an important problem, which is the determination of index weights

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call