Abstract

Prediction of ecosystem response to global environmental change is a pressing scientific challenge of major societal relevance. Many ecosystems display nonlinear responses to environmental change, and may even undergo practically irreversible ‘regime shifts’ that initiate ecosystem collapse. Recently, early warning signals based on spatiotemporal metrics have been proposed for the identification of impending regime shifts. The rapidly increasing availability of remotely sensed data provides excellent opportunities to apply such model‐based spatial early warning signals in the real world, to assess ecosystem resilience and identify impending regime shifts induced by global change. Such information would allow land‐managers and policy makers to interfere and avoid catastrophic shifts, but also to induce regime shifts that move ecosystems to a desired state. Here, we show that the application of spatial early warning signals in real‐world landscapes presents unique and unexpected challenges, and may result in misleading conclusions when employed without careful consideration of the spatial data and processes at hand. We identify key practical and theoretical issues and provide guidelines for applying spatial early warning signals in heterogeneous, real‐world landscapes based on literature review and examples from real‐world data. Major identified issues include (1) spatial heterogeneity in real‐world landscapes may enhance reversibility of regime shifts and boost landscape‐level resilience to environmental change (2) ecosystem states are often difficult to define, while these definitions have great impact on spatial early warning signals and (3) spatial environmental variability and socio‐economic factors may affect spatial patterns, spatial early warning signals and associated regime shift predictions. We propose a novel framework, shifting from an ecosystem perspective towards a landscape approach. The framework can be used to identify conditions under which resilience assessment with spatial remotely sensed data may be successful, to support well‐informed application of spatial early warning signals, and to improve predictions of ecosystem responses to global environmental change.

Highlights

  • Identification and prediction of ecosystem responses to global en‐ vironmental change is currently a key scientific challenge (Sato & Lindenmayer, 2018; World Resources Institute, 2005)

  • Real‐world landscapes are complex due to spatial heterogeneity induced by geo(morpho)logical heterogeneity and socio‐ecological interactions

  • This may lead to several complications when applying spatial early warning signals (SEWS) in real‐world landscapes (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Identification and prediction of ecosystem responses to global en‐ vironmental change is currently a key scientific challenge (Sato & Lindenmayer, 2018; World Resources Institute, 2005). KEYWORDS alternative stable states, critical slowing down, early warning signals, ecosystem resilience, environmental change, landscapes, regime shifts, remote sensing, spatial patterns, tipping points The increasing availability and resolution of remotely sensed gridded data (Gómez, White, & Wulder, 2016) provides a unique opportunity to monitor ecosystem resilience and detect im‐ pending regime shifts induced by global change all around the globe.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call