Abstract

We discuss in detail the spatial distribution of angular momentum inside the nucleon. We show that the discrepancies between different definitions originate from terms that integrate to zero. Even though these terms can safely be dropped at the integrated level, they have to be taken into account when discussing distributions. Using the scalar diquark model, we illustrate our results and, for the first time, check explicitly that the equivalence between kinetic and canonical orbital angular momentum persists at the level of distributions, as expected in a system without gauge degrees of freedom.

Highlights

  • Understanding how the spin of the nucleon originates from the spin and orbital motion of its constituent is one of the current key questions in hadronic physics

  • Ji has shown that the total angular momentum of quarks and gluons can be expressed in terms of generalized parton distributions (GPDs) [4]

  • Where T μν(x) is the Energy-Momentum Tensor (EMT) density associated with the system, which accounts for the fact that the fields are affected by Lorentz transformations owing to their dependence on space-time points

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Understanding how the spin of the nucleon originates from the spin and orbital motion of its constituent is one of the current key questions in hadronic physics. One of the main conceptual issues is that the decomposition of the nucleon spin is not unique [1,2,3] This intrinsic ambiguity is sometimes considered as a sign indicating that the question is not physical. Ji has shown that the (kinetic) total angular momentum of quarks and gluons can be expressed in terms of generalized parton distributions (GPDs) [4]. As shown by Burkardt [8, 9], GPDs contain information about the spatial distribution of quarks and gluons inside the nucleon. Adhikari and Burkardt compared different definitions of the angular momentum density and reached the conclusion that none of the definitions agree at the density level They attributed some of the discrepancies to missing total divergence terms, as it had been pointed out earlier in Refs.

ENERGY-MOMENTUM AND GENERALIZED ANGULAR MOMENTUM TENSORS
Belinfante-improved tensors
Kinetic tensors
Parametrization in terms of form factors
DENSITIES IN INSTANT FORM
DENSITIES IN FRONT FORM
ILLUSTRATION WITHIN THE SCALAR DIQUARK MODEL
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.