Abstract

BackgroundVery little is known about the temporal or spatial movement patterns of Chinese giant salamanders (Andrias davidianus) due to their rarity, remote habitat and secretive nature. Commercial breeding farms provide a unique opportunity as a source of animals for reintroduction and spatial ecology studies, which will help inform conservation management efforts for this threatened species. We surgically implanted radio transmitters into the body cavity of 31 juvenile giant salamanders, and these salamanders were subsequently released into two small river systems (Donghe and Heihe Rivers) located in the Qinling Mountains of central China and were monitored daily from May 2013 to August 2014.ResultsOnly two salamanders survived through the end of the project at the Heihe River compared with 12 at the Donghe River, thus movement data for salamanders released at the Heihe river are described individually. The overall sedentariness (ratio of no movement to all observations) for the two salamanders at the Heihe River was 0.29 and 0.28 compared to the average sedentariness of 0.26 ± 0.01 for the 12 salamanders at the Donghe River. Mean daily movement was 15.4 m ± 0.7 at the Heihe River compared to 9.3 m ± 0.3 at the Donghe River. Overall linear home range (LHR) was 246 m and 392 m for the two salamanders at the Heihe River, compared with a mean LHR of 227.2 m ± 70.5 at the Donghe River. The Donghe salamanders exhibited different movement patterns across seasons, having higher sedentariness, shorter daily movement, and smaller LHR in winter than in summer. Up-stream dispersal and fidelity to release site were recorded at both rivers. The mean dispersal distance for the Donghe River salamanders was 145.3 m ± 61.9, while the two surviving salamanders at the Heihe River had a dispersal distance of 211 m and 205 m.ConclusionsThis project provides important insights on the movement ecology of a large aquatic salamander species, and in particular, our results may assist with reintroduction efforts by developing best management practices on when and where to release animals as a conservation strategy.

Highlights

  • Very little is known about the temporal or spatial movement patterns of Chinese giant salamanders (Andrias davidianus) due to their rarity, remote habitat and secretive nature

  • Very little is known regarding other aspects of movement for Chinese giant salamander (CGS) and Japanese giant salamander (JGS), there are a number of studies on movement ecology for hellbenders [14, 17,18,19] that can be used for comparison

  • Sedentariness and daily movement A total of 5939 salamander locations were recorded during the study, of which 4441 were from the Donghe River

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Very little is known about the temporal or spatial movement patterns of Chinese giant salamanders (Andrias davidianus) due to their rarity, remote habitat and secretive nature. According to the IUCN Red List, the hellbender and the JGS are listed as Near Threatened, while the CGS as Critically Endangered [8,9,10]. Having an understanding of the target species’ movement ecology is crucial to designing reintroduction projects; for example, with aquatic species, choosing a long enough stretch of river for released animals to diversify is important for the establishment of a reintroduced population. These three giant salamander species are reported to be highly sedentary [12,13,14]. Very little is known regarding other aspects of movement for CGS and JGS, there are a number of studies on movement ecology for hellbenders [14, 17,18,19] that can be used for comparison

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call