Abstract

The study provides a comprehensive data analysis of demographic and socio-economic characteristics in Serbian regions as factors of uneven regional development. The data were provided by the official population censuses from 1953 to 2011. The study uses the following demographic indicators: population; the index of population change; population density; the share of migrants in the total population; the share of 65+ population; and the average age of the population. The indicators of the regions’ socio-economic development were as follows: the level of development of cities and municipalities; the share of uneducated population; the share of the population with secondary and higher education; the share of welfare recipients; the share of employed population; the share of computer illiterate persons; and the share of the unemployed. The research results have shown significant regional discrepancies: Belgrade, Kosovo and Metohija regions are economically prosperous regions, attractive for migrants from other parts of Serbia, the situation is quite the opposite in Southern and Eastern Serbia, characterized by the outflow of the population and economic underdevelopment, especially in the border areas. The other two regions are within the two extremes, Vojvodina being closer to Belgrade and Sumadija and Western Serbia, to Southern and Eastern Serbia.

Highlights

  • The Republic of Serbia has diverse geographical and socio-economic characteristics such as the uneven distribution of the population caused by geographical, social and historical factors

  • We provide a comparative overview of the basic demographic indicators for the period of fifty-eight years, placing a special emphasis on the last census

  • Drawing upon the available census data, this paper sought to examine the influence of spatial demographic inequalities on regional development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Republic of Serbia has diverse geographical and socio-economic characteristics such as the uneven distribution of the population caused by geographical, social and historical factors. Apart from the pronounced geographical differences, the regions have different demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The geographical factors had prevailed until the end of the Second World War, and social factors took over as industrialization led to intensive migration from rural areas to cities. Serbia had mostly been an agricultural country [1]. The demographic determinant only emphasized the existing differences resulting in significant regional disrepancies. It is necessary to address the issues of unbalanced population distribution in order to ensure sustainable development of all parts of Serbia [2]

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call