Abstract

AbstractObserving systems consisting of a finite number of in situ monitoring stations can provide high-quality measurements with the ability to quality assure both the instruments and the data but offer limited information over larger geographic areas. This paper quantifies the spatial coverage represented by a finite set of monitoring stations by using global data—data that are possibly of lower resolution and quality. For illustration purposes, merged satellite temperature data from Microwave Sounding Units are used to estimate the representativeness of the Global Climate Observing System Reference Upper-Air Network (GRUAN). While many metrics exist for evaluating the representativeness of a site, the ability to have highly accurate monthly averaged data is essential for both trend detection and climatology evaluation. The calculated correlations of the monthly averaged upper-troposphere satellite-derived temperatures over the GRUAN stations with all other pixels around the globe show that the current 9 certified GRUAN stations have moderate correlations (r ≥ 0.7) for approximately 10% of the earth, but an expanded network incorporating another 15 stations would result in moderate correlations for just over 60% of the earth. This analysis indicates that the value of additional stations can be quantified by using historical, satellite, or model data and can be used to reveal critical gaps in current monitoring capabilities. Evaluating the value of potential additional stations and prioritizing their initiation can optimize networks. The expansion of networks can be evaluated in a manner that allows for optimal benefit on the basis of optimization theory and economic analyses.

Highlights

  • This paper offers one method for assessing the value of a monitoring network composed of a small set of stations

  • We examine Global Climate Observing System Reference Upper-Air Network (GRUAN) as a network of stations for which we would like to understand the spatial representativeness of the individual stations and we use available Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU) monthly averaged deseasonalized observations as our reference dataset

  • An 11-station GRUAN offered coverage of the upper troposphere for 234 3 106 km2 when correlations of 0.7 were considered, while the current 9 GRUAN stations only offer coverage of 52 3 106 km2, with similar degradation observed for the coverage of the stratosphere

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper offers one method for assessing the value of a monitoring network composed of a small set of stations. We have examined a number of metrics for evaluating individual sites and focused, as an example, on the ability of a monitoring site to reproduce monthly variability in upper-air temperature at nearby locations, using correlations as a primary way to describe the spatial representativeness. This technique proves to be appropriate because the correlation results display a smooth behavior; if an inhomogeneous situation were the case, the techniques would not be appropriate. We expanded this approach to evaluate the network as a whole and discussed the need for redundancy and optimization techniques that can be applied

Monthly means
Spatial averages
Representativeness of individual stations
Representativeness of a network of stations
Expansion and contraction of networks
Optimization of additional stations
Network robustness
Alternative metrics for evaluating a network
10. Economic analyses of network decisions
Findings
11. Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call