Abstract

The relationship of stand top and stand mean height is important for forest growth and yield modeling, but it has not been explored for natural mixed forests. Observations of stand top and stand mean height can present spatial dependence or autocorrelation, which should be considered in modeling. Simultaneous autoregressive (SAR) models, including spatial lag model (SLM), spatial Durbin model (SDM) and spatial error model (SEM), within nine spatial weight matrices were utilized to model the stand top and stand mean height relationship in the mixed Quercus mongolica Fisch. ex Ledeb. broadleaved natural stands of Northeast China, using ordinary least squares (OLS) as a benchmark model. The results showed that there was a high linear relationship between stand top and stand mean height and that there was a positive spatial autocorrelation pattern in model residuals of OLS. Moreover, SEM and SDM performed better than OLS in terms of reducing the spatial dependence of model residuals and model fitting, regardless of which spatial weight matrix was used. SEM was better than SDM. SLM scarcely reduced the spatial autocorrelation of model residuals. Among nine spatial matrices in SEM, rook contiguous matrix performed best in model fitting, followed by inverse distances raised to the second power (1/d2) and local statistics model matrix (LSM).

Highlights

  • Forest site productivity remains an essential concern in forestry because of its significant role in forest resource availability [1]

  • Our results showed a similar finding as the studies of Kissling and Carl [27] and Meng et al [42] in case 2, that spatial error model (SEM) was the best spatial autoregressive model to decrease the spatial dependence and improve the model fitting, independent of which spatial weight matrix was used

  • Three simultaneous autoregressive (SAR) models with different nine spatial weight matrices were used to model the relationships of stand top and stand mean height in mixed natural forests, with ordinary least squares (OLS) as a benchmark

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest site productivity remains an essential concern in forestry because of its significant role in forest resource availability [1]. Estimating site productivity is crucial to predict forest growth and yield, as well as to maintain sustainable management of forest resources [2,3]. Many foresters have paid increased attention to the estimation of site productivity through site indices based on the national forest inventory (NFI) data [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.