Abstract

Visual and haptic judgments of stimulus orientation were examined intramodally and crossmodally by having subjects reproduced standard stimulus orientations simultaneously with their inspection or after a delay. For all conditions, an oblique effect was obtained, i.e. vertical and horizontal orientations were reproduced reliably more accurately than oblique orientations. Although intramodal differences were large, with haptic errors being greater than visual errors, cross-model differences were small. Furthermore, while for intramodal conditions simultaneous visual reproductions were reliably more accurate than delayed reproductions but haptic reproductions were more accurate when delayed, cross-modal errors were reliable greater with simultaneous reproductions, regardless of whether the standard orientation was visual or haptic. The modality differences reflect basic differences in stimulus information processing and the stability of the oblique effect across the experimental conditions suggests that perceptual spatial anisotropic effects are strongly influenced by experiential factors.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.