Abstract

Given the background of urbanization and rural revitalization in the new era, it is important to explore the synergy between regional macroeconomics and rural transformation, as a balanced and coordinated urban–rural relationship must be built to promote regional sustainable development and rural revitalization. This paper used the spatial econometric model to study the spatiotemporal synergy and interaction between Xinjiang’s county economy and rural transformation from 2007 to 2017. The conclusions were as follows. A clear spatial difference exists between the county economy and the rural transformation level, and regional bulk agricultural products lack competitiveness. The synergy between the county economy and rural transformation is weak, as the county economy is lagging while rural transformation progresses without collaboration, indicating different types of non-equivalence. The county economy has a stronger spatial dependence on rural transformation and insufficient spillover, a stagnating effect, mainly negative driving effects, and unstable interaction effects; while the unstable changes in rural transformation affect the county economy. The urbanization rate, urban wage level, rural employment structure, and planting area per capita were the main influencing factors. It is necessary to deepen rural transformation, consolidate and enhance its stability, cultivate regional growth poles, promote overall development, and promote regional coordination.

Highlights

  • Published: 10 May 2021In recent years, the steady development of regional economic policies has driven changes in the rural economic environment

  • With the spatial lag model, the analysis reveals the strength of the impact of the county economy on rural transformation and vice versa

  • The results showed that the local driving effect of the county economy and rural transformation was dominated by a negative drive, in which the county economy accounted for

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The steady development of regional economic policies has driven changes in the rural economic environment. Villages have built a new format for the rural economy based on their agricultural structure, planting structure, and the integration of traditional and emerging industries. These new dynamics of rural transformation and development and the coordinated development of regional macroeconomics are playing an important role in narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas, establishing a reasonable relationship between industry and agriculture, realizing broad and deep poverty reduction and achieving rural revitalization [3]. Phan Le conducted an extensive survey of 2150 households in 12 provinces in Vietnam to explain the microeconomic characteristics of the Southeast Asian economic activities involved in rural transformation [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call