Spatial and temporal dosimetry of individual electron FLASH beam pulses using radioluminescence imaging

Abstract

Purpose. In this study, spatio-temporal beam profiling for electron ultra-high dose rate (UHDR; >40 Gy s−1) radiation via Cherenkov emission and radioluminescence imaging was investigated using intensified complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor cameras. Methods. The cameras, gated to FLASH optimized linear accelerator pulses, imaged radioluminescence and Cherenkov emission incited by single pulses of a UHDR (>40 Gy s−1) 10 MeV electron beam delivered to the isocenter. Surface dosimetry was investigated via imaging Cherenkov emission or scintillation from a solid water phantom or Gd2O2S:Tb screen positioned on top of the phantom, respectively. Projected depth–dose profiles were imaged from a tank filled with water (Cherenkov emission) and a 1 g l−1 quinine sulfate solution (scintillation). These optical results were compared with projected lateral dose profiles measured by Gafchromic film at different depths, including the surface. Results. The per-pulse beam output from Cherenkov imaging agreed with the photomultiplier tube Cherenkov output to within 3% after about the first five to seven ramp-up pulses. Cherenkov emission and scintillation were linear with dose (R 2 = 0.987 and 0.995, respectively) and independent of dose rate from ∼50 to 300 Gy s−1 (0.18–0.91 Gy/pulse). The surface dose distribution from film agreed better with scintillation than with Cherenkov emission imaging (3%/3 mm gamma pass rates of 98.9% and 88.8%, respectively). Using a 450 nm bandpass filter, the quinine sulfate-based water imaging of the projected depth optical profiles agreed with the projected film dose to within 5%. Conclusion. The agreement of surface dosimetry using scintillation screen imaging and Gafchromic film suggests it can verify the consistency of daily beam quality assurance parameters with an accuracy of around 2% or 2 mm. Cherenkov-based surface dosimetry was affected by the target’s optical properties, prompting additional calibration. In projected depth–dose profiling, scintillation imaging via spectral suppression of Cherenkov emission provided the best match to film. Both camera-based imaging modalities resolved dose from single UHDR beam pulses of up to 60 Hz repetition rate and 1 mm spatial resolution.