Abstract

Within a large carnivore guild, subordinate competitors (African wild dog, Lycaon pictus, and cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus) might reduce the limiting effects of dominant competitors (lion, Panthera leo, and spotted hyena, Crocuta crocuta) by avoiding them in space, in time, or through patterns of prey selection. Understanding how these competitors cope with one other can inform strategies for their conservation. We tested how mechanisms of niche partitioning promote coexistence by quantifying patterns of prey selection and the use of space and time by all members of the large carnivore guild within Liuwa Plain National Park in western Zambia. Lions and hyenas specialized on wildebeest, whereas wild dogs and cheetahs selected broader diets including smaller and less abundant prey. Spatially, cheetahs showed no detectable avoidance of areas heavily used by dominant competitors, but wild dogs avoided areas heavily used by lions. Temporally, the proportion of kills by lions and hyenas did not detectably differ across four time periods (day, crepuscular, early night, and late night), but wild dogs and especially cheetahs concentrated on time windows that avoided nighttime hunting by lions and hyenas. Our results provide new insight into the conditions under which partitioning may not allow for coexistence for one subordinate species, the African wild dog, while it does for cheetah. Because of differences in responses to dominant competitors, African wild dogs may be more prone to competitive exclusion (local extirpation), particularly in open, uniform ecosystems with simple (often wildebeest dominated) prey communities, where spatial avoidance is difficult.

Highlights

  • Interference competition affects virtually all species (Pianka, 1981; Schoener, 1974; Sinclair, 1985; Ziv, Abramsky, Kotler, & Subach, 1993), and is widely recognized as an important force structuring large carnivore guilds (Caro & Stoner, 2003; Creel, Spong, & Creel, 2001; Palomares & Caro, 1999)

  • The ecological effects of terrestrial large carnivores remain strong in Africa relative to most other parts of the world, and large protected areas in Eastern and Southern Africa have retained ecologically intact large carnivore guilds including lion (Panthera leo), leopard (Panthera pardus), spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), and African wild dog (Lycaon pictus) populations

  • We examined the use of space and time by the large carnivore guild of Liuwa Plain National Park (LPNP) in western Zambia, consisting of hyenas, lions, cheetahs, and African wild dogs

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Interference competition affects virtually all species (Pianka, 1981; Schoener, 1974; Sinclair, 1985; Ziv, Abramsky, Kotler, & Subach, 1993), and is widely recognized as an important force structuring large carnivore guilds (Caro & Stoner, 2003; Creel, Spong, & Creel, 2001; Palomares & Caro, 1999). Cozzi et al (2012) found a high degree of overlap in activity signals from GPS collars on African wild dogs, cheetahs, lions, and hyenas, concluding that overlaps in activity patterns were driven by food limitation that constrained avoidance in that ecosystem Despite this result, data from most ecosystems show that the majority of hunts by wild dogs and (especially) cheetahs are typically diurnal or crepuscular (Creel & Creel, 2002; Estes & Goddard, 1967; Mills & Biggs, 1993), which reduces the likelihood of direct interference competition with more nocturnal lions and (especially) hyenas (Cozzi et al, 2012; Kolowski, Katan, Theis, & Holekamp, 2007; Mills & Biggs, 1993). We hypothesized that hyenas and lions would show strong dietary overlap by specializing on the most abundant prey and that cheetahs and wild dogs would reduce dietary overlap by preying on a wider range of species

| METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call