Abstract

SUMMARYWe assess the spatial accuracy and performance of a mixed‐order, explicit multi‐stage method in which an inexpensive low‐order scheme is used for the initial stages, and a more expensive high‐order scheme is used for the final stage only. Compared with the use of a high‐order scheme for all stages, we observe that the mixed‐order scheme achieves comparable accuracy and convergence while providing a speed‐up of a factor of two on mesh sizes of O(106 − 107) tetrahedron. For calculations with significant adaptive mesh refinement, a more modest speed‐up of 30% is obtained. Published 2012. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.