Abstract

City planning in Australian cities has seen a gradual shift in approach, away from planning to facilitate mobility by car in the post-war period toward planning for land-use/public transport integration. By assessing the supply of public transport for city accessibility, a considerable variation within each city can be seen. Of interest is the extent to which there is a relationship between the quality of public transport accessibility and the spatial distribution of socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage. This paper examines this issue by mapping spatial data on socioeconomic disadvantage and advantage against indicators of public transport accessibility. The findings show that Australian cities are characterized by a significant level of spatially manifested socioeconomic inequality exacerbated by transport disadvantage. It is argued that a coincidence of public transport infrastructure and service improvements as well as urban intensification and housing affordability policies are required to counteract these trends.

Highlights

  • This paper seeks to investigate the spatial context between public transport accessibility and relative social and economic advantage and disadvantage in Australia’s five largest capital cities

  • We superimpose public transport accessibility measures from the Spatial Network Analysis for Multimodal Urban Transport Systems (SNAMUTS) indexes (Curtis and Scheurer, 2016) on the Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) measures compiled from census data by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)

  • All five Australian capital cities display an underlying trend for average socioeconomic status to increase in line with public transport accessibility measures including the geographical coverage of the network and the average reach of a 30-minute journey, though to a varying degree and with varying secondary intervening factors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper seeks to investigate the spatial context between public transport accessibility and relative social and economic advantage and disadvantage in Australia’s five largest capital cities. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE 10.1 add a greater degree of motility (Kaufmann, 2011) to the suite of items constituting socioeconomic advantage for this group. For this purpose, we superimpose public transport accessibility measures from the Spatial Network Analysis for Multimodal Urban Transport Systems (SNAMUTS) indexes (Curtis and Scheurer, 2016) on the Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA) measures compiled from census data by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). A historical overview will introduce the context and review existing literature, while a concluding discussion will reflect on some implications of the findings for policy makers

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call