Abstract

The aim of sparse phase retrieval is to recover a $k$-sparse signal $\mathbf{x}_0\in \mathbb{C}^{d}$ from quadratic measurements $|\langle \mathbf{a}_i,\mathbf{x}_0\rangle|^2$ where $\mathbf{a}_i\in \mathbb{C}^d, i=1,\ldots,m$. Noting $|\langle \mathbf{a}_i,\mathbf{x}_0\rangle|^2={\text{Tr}}(A_iX_0)$ with $A_i=\mathbf{a}_i\mathbf{a}_i^*\in \mathbb{C}^{d\times d}, X_0=\mathbf{x}_0\mathbf{x}_0^*\in \mathbb{C}^{d\times d}$, one can recast sparse phase retrieval as a problem of recovering a rank-one sparse matrix from linear measurements. Yin and Xin introduced PhaseLiftOff which presents a proxy of rank-one condition via the difference of trace and Frobenius norm. By adding sparsity penalty to PhaseLiftOff, in this paper, we present a novel model to recover sparse signals from quadratic measurements. Theoretical analysis shows that the solution to our model provides the stable recovery of $\mathbf{x}_0$ under almost optimal sampling complexity $m=O(k\log(d/k))$. The computation of our model is carried out by the difference of convex function algorithm (DCA). Numerical experiments demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art algorithms used for solving sparse phase retrieval.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.