Abstract
This article reports on a series of experiments in statistical part-of-speech tagging of Swedish texts, with different probabilistic models and different smoothing schemes for both lexical and contextual probabilities. The most important conclusions are that lexical and contextual probabilities require different smoothing methods and that smoothing is only crucial for lexical probabilities. Of the particular smoothing methods tested in the experiments, Good-Turing estimation achieves the best results for the lexical model, while a simple additive smoothing scheme gives the best performance for the contextual model.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.