Abstract
Jurisdiction administrative dispute, due to the influence of the Inter-American Court of human rights, has in recent years adopted measures of reparation of the damage in itself considered as opposed to the consequence damage, especially when there has been a breach to the human rights of the plaintiffs; in several judgments of the Council of State ordering the adoption of restorative justice measures to repair in natura to the victims. However, the Court confuses sometimes damage event with the damage result and in our environment, only progress in the objective of the event damage repair when there has been an infringement of the right to health, being budding construction of objective criteria of compensation or repair when other conventional or constitutional rights are violated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
