Abstract

Spanish has a restriction on palatal nasals and laterals in the coda causing them to be realized as dental/alveolar coronals. In the onset position, the palatal point of articulation is retained, bello ‘beautiful-masc.’, beldad ‘beauty’; doña ‘Madam’, don ‘Mister’. Alternations such as these led phonologists to propose a rule of depalatalization that turns an underlying palatal nasal/lateral into a coronal (Contreras 1977; Harris 1983). Pensado (1997) and Harris (1999) later tried to debunk this rule, the former on psycholinguistic grounds, and the latter on the basis of the word structure of Spanish (palatals are always followed by –e). More recently, within an optimality-theoretic framework and through loan word evidence, Lloret and Mascaró (2006) argue again in favor of an active process of depalatalization in Modern Spanish. Taking Lloret and Mascaró as its point of departure, this paper expands the discussion on depalatalization to consider diachronic data and the role of the underlying representation and the perception grammar. Historical data supports depalatalization as an active phenomenon in Old and Medieval Spanish; yet the morphophonological alternations cannot be considered active/productive synchronically. Unlike previous serial models of phonology, an OT framework allows for the incorporation of diachronic data into the analysis, thus explaining how the current situation came about and shedding light on synchronic alternations. OT also provides a formalization of the role of the underlying representation in the diachronic change and in synchronic loanword evidence, thus providing support for depalatalization as an active phonotactic restriction.

Highlights

  • The existence, or not, of a process of depalatalization of nasals and laterals in Spanish has been long debated in phonology (Contreras, 1977; Harris, 1983; Pensado, 1997; Harris, 1999; Bermúdez-Otero 2006; Lloret & Mascaró, 2006; Eddington 2012)

  • Historical data supports the view that depalatalization was active in Old Spanish and Medieval Spanish; yet, contra Lloret & Mascaró and in agreement with Bermúdez-Otero (2006) and Eddington (2012), it is argued that the morphophonological alternations cannot be considered active synchronically

  • Depalatalization is analyzed in terms of a phonotactic restriction on coda palatals and of Base Identity in the production and perception grammar

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The existence, or not, of a process of depalatalization of nasals and laterals in Spanish has been long debated in phonology (Contreras, 1977; Harris, 1983; Pensado, 1997; Harris, 1999; Bermúdez-Otero 2006; Lloret & Mascaró, 2006; Eddington 2012). The evidence provided supports the view that depalatalization was an active phonological process in Old Spanish exhibiting a surface alternation between a palatal and an alveolar allophone within and across the word (i.e., singular/plural and across-the-word resyllabification). The data from Old Spanish suggests that depalatalization happened regularly (i.e. the vacillation between singular pie[l] and plural pie[ʎ]es forms), and that the constraint ID-BA(PL) was violated, allowing for palatals in the onset of plural forms and in prevocalic word-final position, and alveolars in the coda and preconsonantal word-final position.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.