Abstract
AbstractHalide substitution in phenethylammonium spacer cations (X‐PEA+, X = F, Cl, Br) is a facile strategy to improve the performance of PEA based perovskite solar cells (PSCs). However, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of X‐PEA based quasi‐2D (Q‐2D) PSCs is still unsatisfactory and the underlying mechanisms are in debate. Here, the in‐depth study on the impact of halide substitution on the crystal orientation and multi‐phase distribution in PEA based perovskite films are reported. The halide substitution eliminates n = 1 2D perovskite and thus leads to the perpendicular crystal orientation. Furthermore, nucleation competition exists between small‐n and large‐n phases in PEA and X‐PEA based perovskites. This gives rise to the orderly distribution of different n‐phases in the PEA and F‐PEA based films, and random distribution in Cl‐PEA and Br‐PEA based films. As a result, (F‐PEA)2MA3Pb4I12 (MA = CH3NH3+, n = 4) based PSCs achieve a PCE of 18.10%, significantly higher than those of PEA (12.23%), Cl‐PEA (7.93%) and Br‐PEA (6.08%) based PSCs. Moreover, the F‐PEA based devices exhibit remarkably improved stability compared to their 3D counterparts.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
