Abstract

Better understanding of ecology is crucial for the success of endangered species conservation programmes. Little information is available on space use, conspecific interactions and recursions by one such species, the red panda Ailurus fulgens. To address this deficiency, we used GPS telemetry to examine their home range, core area, home-range overlap, dynamic interactions and recursive movement, and investigated the effect of sex, age and body mass on these behaviours across seasons. The median annual home range size was 1.41 km2, with nearly a quarter of this range being used as the core area. Sex and reproductive status were the key determinants of space use patterns on a seasonal scale, while body mass and age remained significant correlates for the core area. The home range of males was nearly double that of females, likely because of the polygynous mating system in red pandas. Females avoided overlapping home ranges, while males overlapped home range with up to 4 females, and neighbouring males overlapped nearly half of their ranges. We found rare interactions between males and females outside the mating season. Red pandas showed site fidelity within their territory, with seasonal variation across sex classes. We also observed high individual variation in patterns of both space use and recursive movement. Taken together, these results suggest that differences in biological requirements across seasons determine red panda space use patterns, conspecific interactions and recursion. However, forage availability and quality, climatic factors, disturbances and habitat fragmentation are also likely to influence these behaviours, and these factors need to be investigated.

Highlights

  • Space use and conspecific interactions may vary across species due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors

  • Our findings demonstrate that red panda space use patterns varied across spatial scales, with marginal fluctuations in seasonal home range sizes

  • The variation in home range size was determined by sex, while body mass and age influenced the core area, but individual-level variation existed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Space use and conspecific interactions may vary across species due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors (van Beest et al 2011, Tucker et al 2014). Solitary species lack cooperative behaviour and maintain distinct territories which may or may not overlap with those of conspecifics (Sandell 1989). These ecological behaviours are influenced by interactions between animals (including but not limited to conspecifics) and their surrounding environment (Korbelová et al 2016, Viana et al 2018). Better understanding of such ecological behaviours is crucial for the success of endangered species conservation programmes.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call