Abstract

Animals use a variety of proximate cues to assess habitat quality when resources vary spatiotemporally. Two nonmutually exclusive strategies to assess habitat quality involve either direct assessment of landscape features or observation of social cues from conspecifics as a form of information transfer about forage resources. The conspecific attraction hypothesis proposes that individual space use is dependent on the distribution of conspecifics rather than the location of resource patches, whereas the resource dispersion hypothesis proposes that individual space use and social association are driven by the abundance and distribution of resources. We tested the conspecific attraction and the resource dispersion hypotheses as two nonmutually exclusive hypotheses explaining social association and of adult female caribou (Rangifer tarandus). We used location data from GPS collars to estimate interannual site fidelity and networks representing home range overlap and social associations among individual caribou. We found that home range overlap and social associations were correlated with resource distribution in summer and conspecific attraction in winter. In summer, when resources were distributed relatively homogeneously, interannual site fidelity was high and home range overlap and social associations were low. Conversely, in winter when resources were distributed relatively heterogeneously, interannual site fidelity was low and home range overlap and social associations were high. As access to resources changes across seasons, caribou appear to alter social behavior and space use. In summer, caribou may use cues associated with the distribution of forage, and in winter caribou may use cues from conspecifics to access forage. Our results have broad implications for our understanding of caribou socioecology, suggesting that caribou use season‐specific strategies to locate forage. Caribou populations continue to decline globally, and our finding that conspecific attraction is likely related to access to forage suggests that further fragmentation of caribou habitat could limit social association among caribou, particularly in winter when access to resources may be limited.

Highlights

  • Animals use a variety of proximate cues that might indicate habitat quality (Fletcher, 2006)

  • Predictions about the distribution of resources may be impractical to test in the field; we do not measure resource dispersion or abundance, but rather, our predictions are informed by the natural history and biology of caribou as they relate to seasonal differences in the access to forage (for examples see Bergerud, 1974; Briand, Ouellet, & Dussault, 2009; TA B L E 1 Predictions of conspecific attraction (CAH) and resource dispersion (RDH) hypotheses with associated conclusions

  • In some cases the null hypothesis supports either the conspecific attraction hypothesis (CAH) or resource dispersion hypothesis (RDH), but in other cases the null hypothesis may be driven by unmeasured phenomena

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Animals use a variety of proximate cues that might indicate habitat quality (Fletcher, 2006). In the context of integrating social and spatial processes, the presence of conspecifics (CAH) or familiarity with the distribution resources (RDH) may contribute to an individual's ability to access forage. Predictions about the distribution of resources may be impractical to test in the field; we do not measure resource dispersion or abundance, but rather, our predictions are informed by the natural history and biology of caribou as they relate to seasonal differences in the access to forage (for examples see Bergerud, 1974; Briand, Ouellet, & Dussault, 2009; TA B L E 1 Predictions of conspecific attraction (CAH) and resource dispersion (RDH) hypotheses with associated conclusions

Result of our study
Findings
| METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call