Space, Scale, and Scaling in Entropy Maximizing. 最大熵中的空间、尺度与标度

Abstract

Entropy measures were first introduced into geographical analysis during a period when the concept of human systems in equilibrium was in its ascendancy. In particular, entropy maximizing, in direct analogy with equilibrium statistical mechanics, provides a powerful framework in which to generate location and interaction models. This was introduced and popularized by Wilson, and it led to many different extensions that elaborate the framework rather than extend it to different kinds of models. I review two such extensions here: how space can be introduced into the formulation through defining a “spatial entropy” and how entropy can be decomposed and nested to capture spatial variation at different scales. Two obvious directions to this research remain implicit. First, the more substantive interpretations of the concept of entropy for different shapes and sizes of geographical systems have hardly been developed. Second, an explicit dynamics associated with generating probability distributions has not been attempted until quite recently with respect to the search for how power laws emerge as signatures of universality in complex systems. In short, the connections between entropy maximizing, substantive interpretations of entropy measures, and the longer‐term dynamics of how equilibrium distributions are reached and maintained have not been well developed. This literature gap has many implications for future research, and, in conclusion, I sketch the need for new and different entropy measures that enable us to see how equilibrium spatial distributions can be generated as the outcomes of dynamic processes that converge to a steady state.