Abstract

The thematic similarity of scientific articles can be examined using bibliographic metadata such as titles, keywords, descriptions, and distribution of citations. Researchers use traditional co-citation analysis, bibliographic linking, or text analysis to process and further organize publications. Scientometric works have reported that they put more and more effort into explicit combinations of the different approaches to obtain and verify the achieved results. These studies show that the data quality strongly determines the chosen method. If we lack a valuable, representative data set, the researchers’ attention leads toward modeling an appropriate metadata space. Hence, academics can construct a suitable semantic space if they need to organize a set of publications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.