Abstract

Increasing evidence has uncovered associations between the cognition of abstract schemas and spatial perception. Here we examine such associations for Western musical syntax, tonality. Spatial metaphors are ubiquitous when describing tonality: stable, closural tones are considered to be spatially central and, as gravitational foci, spatially lower. We investigated whether listeners, musicians and nonmusicians, indeed associate tonal relationships with visuospatial dimensions, including spatial height, centrality, laterality, and size, implicitly or explicitly, and whether such mappings are consistent with established metaphors. In the explicit paradigm, participants heard a tonality-establishing prime followed by a probe tone and coupled each probe with a subjectively appropriate location (Exp.1) or size (Exp.4). The implicit paradigm used a version of the Implicit Association Test to examine associations of tonal stability with vertical position (Exp.2), lateral position (Exp3) and size (Exp.5). Tonal stability was indeed associated with perceived physical space: the spatial distances between the locations associated with different scale-degrees significantly correlated with the tonal stability differences between these scale-degrees. However, inconsistently with musical discourse, stable tones were associated with leftward (instead of central) and higher (instead of lower) spatial positions. We speculate that these mappings are influenced by emotion, embodying the “good is up” metaphor, and by the spatial structure of music keyboards. Taken together, the results demonstrate a new type of cross-modal correspondence and a hitherto under-researched connotative function of musical structure. Importantly, the results suggest that the spatial mappings of an abstract domain may be independent of the spatial metaphors used to describe that domain.

Highlights

  • Increasing evidence has uncovered associations between the cognition of abstract schemas and spatial perception

  • We examine whether tonal relationships are associated by listeners with physical space, visually perceived: for instance, are more stable scale degrees perceived as situated above or below, to the right or to the left, of unstable scale degrees?

  • In Experiment 1, we examined the association of tonal stability with distance from the tonic (Hypothesis 1), vertical position (Hypothesis 2), lateral position, and centrality (Hypothesis 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increasing evidence has uncovered associations between the cognition of abstract schemas and spatial perception. Inconsistently with musical discourse, stable tones were associated with leftward (instead of central) and higher (instead of lower) spatial positions. We speculate that these mappings are influenced by emotion, embodying the “good is up” metaphor, and by the spatial structure of music keyboards. Vertical orientation (up/down) is used to signify mood (e.g., cheer up, I am feeling down), state of consciousness (wake up), moral virtue (upright) or status (a high position) Such mappings may shape how we speak about abstract domains (i.e., the relevant metaphorical vocabulary) and cognitive processes not explicitly involving language. The present behavioral study extends previous research mapping abstract concepts onto perceived space to a new domain: Western musical tonality. The other scale degrees (2, 4, 6 and 7) are less stable, and imply continuation to their more stable neighbors, 1, 3, or 5; the remaining five chromatic (“out of key”) tones are the least stable, and strongly imply continuation to adjacent diatonic (within-key) notes (for a brief primer on tonality, see supplementary materials A)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.