Abstract

Abstract Aims Up to 95% of intravenous fluid prescription requests for surgical patients are executed by Foundation Year-1(FY1) doctors. This, notwithstanding the plethora of studies suggesting FY1 doctors are inadequately equipped to be prescribing fluids unsupervised. Poor intravenous fluid therapy is associated with an approximate 20% complication rate, including electrolyte abnormalities, dysrhythmia and fluid overload. Methods A closed-loop audit was performed at a large teaching hospital to examine compliance with fluid prescribing guidelines and associated complications. This involved a 4-week retrospective review of drug prescription charts against NICE guidelines followed by a targeted intervention that involved a dedicated teaching session on fluid management in the surgical patient, alongside posters and crib sheets of fluid management on surgical wards. The re-audit using the same criteria compared proportion of prescription errors, over- or under-hydration, and total complications before and after intervention. Results 308 patient records were reviewed (pre-intervention n=185; post-intervention n=123). Documentation of fluids indication (31% vs 46%(p<0.0414)), contingency plans (3% vs 38%(p<0.0001)) and glucose prescription for nil per os patients on maintenance fluids (10% vs 25% (p=0.0029)) improved post-intervention. Fluid balance monitoring (29% vs 9%(p=0.0001)) worsened. The proportion of patients receiving insufficient potassium (91% both rounds), excess sodium (90% vs 92% (p=0.6212)), and the average rate of complications (1 in 1.67 vs 1 in 1.54, p=0.4652) remained unchanged. Conclusion Didactic educational intervention for FY1 doctors on fluid therapy improved documentation on fluids indication, but failed to resolve significant prescription failures and resulted in similar complication rates pre-and post-intervention.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call