SP2.2.16Hospital compound level endoscopy training quality performance: scoping the spectrum

Abstract

Abstract Aims This study aimed to assess the quality of endoscopy training in a single UK Statutory Educational Body (SEB), related to individual hospitals,compared with the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Training (JETS) certification standards. Methods Training procedures numbering 28,928 recorded by 211 consecutive cross-specialty trainee endoscopists registered with JETS in18 hospitals during 2019were analysed. Data included trainer and trainee numbers, training list frequency, procedures, Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) completion and Key Performance Indicators (KPI). Results Annual median training procedures per hospital were 1395 (interquartile range (IQR) 465-2365). Median (IQR) trainers and trainees per unit were 11 (6-18) and 12 (7-16) respectively (ratio 0.8 (0.7-1.3)). Annual training list frequency per trainee was 13 (10-17), 35.0% short of JAG standard (n = 20, p = 0.001, effect size -0.56), and median points per adjusted training list were 11 (5-18). Median DOPS completion per trainee and trainer were 3 (1-6) and 4 (1-7) respectively; completing 0.2 DOPS (0.1-0.4) per list and amounting to 6 (2-12) per 200 procedures: less than half of the JAG standard (p < 0.001, -0.61). Median KPI for OGD: J Manoeuvre 94% (90-96), D2 intubation was 93% (91-96); and for Colonoscopy: Caecal intubation 82% (72-90), and Polyp Detection Rate 25% (18-34). Compound hospital training quality score varied 3-fold, the highest performing hospital scoring 26; compared to the poorest performing scoring 9: median 17 (14-20). Conclusion Important variation in endoscopy unit performance were apparent with compound hospital training quality varying almost 3-fold. Trainees, Training Programme Directors alike, should be aware of such data when planning educational programmes to focus, optimise the quality of endoscopic training.