Abstract
Electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) systems have been suggested as a possible solution to deficiencies in AKI care and have been widely adopted despite limited evidence. The broader literature, however, describes alert fatigue, end-user disengagement and unintended consequences, particularly when systems are introduced with limited end-user input. A nationwide mandate now standardises the biochemical algorithm for reporting AKI but end-user interfaces remain heterogeneous with variations in IT capability, alert intrusiveness and accompanying content.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
