Abstract
The present article is dedicated to an analysis of Soviet identity in the discourse of modern Kazakhstan. The language in the post-Soviet discourse, as it is shown in this paper, is no longer a phenomenon of culture and serves only as a means of capturing and transmitting information. By linguistic manifestations of the last true desire for common stereotypes, standard and tarnish language. In this article (based on publicity, domestic and artistic discourses) identified the main speech strategy in post-Soviet discourse. That include logic-chopping, Offices and simulative anthropocentric interpretation.
Highlights
It is considered that the population of Kazakhstan has been russified and “immersed” in Soviet ideology
Explanation of the above is clear: We cannot forget that how a particular resource that was directly lived through has part of the surround experience, only the Soviet experience is the spring board from which Kazakhstan is repelled in the selection of self-‐‐identification guide lines after independence (Molotov Cocktail 2014: 34)
Russian researchers point out that the mass consciousness and behavior of Russians has only changed a little, and they are not that different from “homo soveticus”: The crystallization of the cultural and political forces in Russia is at the early stage
Summary
It is considered that the population of Kazakhstan (primarily Kazakhs) has been russified and “immersed” in Soviet ideology. The Post-‐‐Soviet discourse in Russia is expressed in the special ideology which is an example of symbiosis of the Soviet great-‐‐power heritage and modern Russian nationalism, ideally embodied in the concept “krymnash” (i.e. Crimea is ours). Kazakh and Russian languages in business, scientific and cultural life of Kazakhstan have their place ranked.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
