Abstract

Based on the worrying development of blue crime in the Gulf of Guinea, this paper examines transnational cooperation in the Yaoundé Architecture and ways to strengthen it. It argues that the Architecture consists of independent states that are hesitant to delegate sovereignty but forced to cooperate because blue crime is inherently transnational and therefore requires transnational responses. For these reasons, the Architecture resembles a network with independent participants, who must cooperate to achieve a common goal, and structural and social control elements meant to overcome coordination problems. Nevertheless, these elements need improving to strengthen cooperation in the Architecture, and by extension, efforts in fighting blue crime. The paper suggests ways in which the Architecture can be strengthened by including commercial actors and international partners in the network, streamlining the roles of structural elements, ensuring a better exchange of information, and implementing agreed measures. This paper is relevant to scholars and practitioners interested in the Yaoundé Architecture and maritime security responses in the Gulf of Guinea.

Highlights

  • The Persistence of Blue Crime in the Gulf of GuineaWhereas piracy has become much less common in East Africa in recent years, the same cannot be said for the continent’s West Coast, which has become the world’s number one piracy hotspot (BBC News, 2019)

  • Based on the worrying development of blue crime in the Gulf of Guinea, this paper examines transnational cooperation in the Yaoundé Architecture and ways to strengthen it

  • This paper argues that the issue of sovereignty sets limits for what transnational cooperation can achieve

Read more

Summary

Hüseyin Yücel

Based on the worrying development of blue crime in the Gulf of Guinea, this paper examines transnational cooperation in the Yaoundé Architecture and ways to strengthen it It argues that the Architecture consists of independent states that are hesitant to delegate sovereignty but forced to cooperate because blue crime is inherently transnational and requires transnational responses. For these reasons, the Architecture resembles a network with independent participants, who must cooperate to achieve a common goal, and structural and social control elements meant to overcome coordination problems.

The Persistence of Blue Crime in the Gulf of Guinea
The Yaoundé Code of Conduct and Its Architecture
National Sovereignty and Political Authority
Conceptualising the Yaoundé Architecture as a Network
The Yaoundé Architecture as a Network
Current Issues
Inclusion of Additional Participants
Structural Elements
Social Control Elements
Further Implementation
Conclusion and Perspectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call