Abstract

Cell-type specific gene expression profiles are needed for many computational methods operating on bulk RNA-Seq samples, such as deconvolution of cell-type fractions and digital cytometry. However, the gene expression profile of a cell type can vary substantially due to both technical factors and biological differences in cell state and surroundings, reducing the efficacy of such methods. Here, we investigated which factors contribute most to this variation. We evaluated different normalization methods, quantified the variance explained by different factors, evaluated the effect on deconvolution of cell type fractions, and examined the differences between UMI-based single-cell RNA-Seq and bulk RNA-Seq. We investigated a collection of publicly available bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq datasets containing B and T cells, and found that the technical variation across laboratories is substantial, even for genes specifically selected for deconvolution, and this variation has a confounding effect on deconvolution. Tissue of origin is also a substantial factor, highlighting the challenge of using cell type profiles derived from blood with mixtures from other tissues. We also show that much of the differences between UMI-based single-cell and bulk RNA-Seq methods can be explained by the number of read duplicates per mRNA molecule in the single-cell sample. Our work shows the importance of either matching or correcting for technical factors when creating cell-type specific gene expression profiles that are to be used together with bulk samples.

Highlights

  • RNA Sequencing is a well-established method for comparing the transcriptome between different cell types, conditions and cell states [1]

  • Cell-type specific gene expression profiles are useful for analyzing bulk RNA-Seq samples containing mixed cell types, since it enables the use of advanced computational methods such as deconvolution of cell type fractions and digital cytometry

  • We found that the number of duplicate reads per mRNA molecule in the single-cell data (UMICF) can explain a substantial fraction of the differences between single-cell and bulk, whereas transcript length biases are generally small in comparison to other effects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

RNA Sequencing is a well-established method for comparing the transcriptome between different cell types, conditions and cell states [1]. Cell types can be separated from samples, for example by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) [2] or magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) [3] before sequencing, and recent advances have made it possible to use RNA-Seq at the single-cell level and to sequence hundreds of thousands of cells [4]. The ever-growing collection of publicly available data enables integrative data analysis across many datasets, making it possible to discover system-wide phenomena. Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 282510 – BLUEPRINT

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.