Abstract

A number of factors may influence tumor rates in rodent carcinogenicity studies, including the animal room environment, genetic differences, food consumption/weight gain, survival/age of the animals, identification of gross lesions, pathology sampling procedures and preparation of the histology slides, and histopathologic diagnosis. The relative importance of these factors is evaluated, making use of laboratory animal carcinogenicity data from the National Toxicology Program and from other sources. An investigator must be aware of these potentially confounding factors, so that appropriate measures can be taken to reduce or eliminate their impact on the interpretation of study results. Certain potential sources of within-study variability can be controlled by appropriate experimental design and by proper conduct according to standard operating procedures. The effect of certain factors influencing tumor prevalence may be magnified when variability from study to study is considered, and thus it may be difficult to formulate a biologically meaningful statistical analysis that uses historical control data in a formal testing framework.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.