Abstract

In their analysis of the sources of Colombia's notable economic growth over the period 1963–80, the authors find that, although much can be accounted for by growth in labour, capital and improvements in the labour force, the contribution of inputs was much higher than expected, particularly in the sub‐period 1974–1980. The authors conclude that future investigations into sources of economic growth would benefit from breaking down growth into sub‐periods, and investigating reasons for sharp differences in performance.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.